Skip to Navigation

Exploring a Flawed Paradigm: Why Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is not enough

The following editorial by Chad Park, Executive Director of The Natural Step Canada, appeared in the Corporate Citizens Mediaplanet Special Report in the National Post on December 28, 2011.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is outdated and counterproductive to successful enterprise and the global sustainability imperative.

CSR encourages us to incorporate environmental and social considerations into a business-as-usual scenario. This is the triple-bottom-line approach and is often depicted with three overlapping circles representing economy, society, and environment.

This is a flawed paradigm.

In fact, economy, society, and environment are not three equal parts, but function like nested eggs. The economy occurs within human society, which in turn exists within the natural environment. The natural capital provided by the Earth sustains everything that exists within it. Accordingly, almost every global mega-trend tells us that without a radical transformation of the way we conduct business, a wide variety of risks and pressures will continue to harm profitability across the board.

Speaking metaphorically, the car we are driving is heading toward a cliff. By adopting CSR in its current form, we are softly applying the brakes and only buying ourselves a little more time. In this scenario, going over the cliff is inevitable and simply a matter of time.

Instead, we should be focused on turning the car around.

Most companies continue to ask themselves: “Based on our business plan, what should our CSR strategy be?” But to succeed in the future, businesses must instead ask: “In light of the global sustainability imperative, what should our business plan be?” Massive opportunities await the organizations that come to grips with the root causes of unsustainability and design them out of their businesses.

Companies like Nike, Interface, and The Co-operators are leading the way with sustainability as a mobilizing corporate strategy, increasing their profits, while generating substantial goodwill, and laying the foundation to be relevant in a sustainable future. The leaders in corporate sustainability will thrive as the operating environment inevitably becomes more difficult, leaving the laggards to perish in their wake.

We need to collectively acknowledge that we aren’t doing nearly enough to succeed in the rapidly changing economy of the 21st century, nor enough to create a society that thrives without drawing down our life-giving natural capital.

Incremental improvements are not enough. We are in need of transformational change. Now is the time for Canadian businesses to exit the highway of unsustainability and chart a new course.

Chad Park is the Executive Director of The Natural Step Canada, a non-profit sustainability organization that delivers leading consulting and education services. He was recently honoured as one of Canada's Clean16—the 16 individuals in Canada who have done the most to advance the cause of sustainability and clean capitalism. For more on The Natural Step Canada, please visit www.thenaturalstep.org/canada.

With contributions from Brendan Seale, Sustainability Advisor at The Natural Step Canada.

To receive quarterly communiqués on sustainable business topics from The Natural Step Canada, please sign up here.

Reproduced with permission.

Share |
______________________________________________________________________________

Thanks for the comment, Mark Anthony.

I absolutely know where you're coming from. My experience working with Nike has been that many people within that organization do too. In fact, I don't think I've ever worked with a company where there was less need for awareness-raising about the need for changed models and strategies. There, it was all about "how." I guess part of the answer lies in the immediate short-term gains that can be made by leveraging the market power of a big company like Nike. The other part, from my perspective, comes from the fact that a company like Nike has resources to invest in innovation that others may not - for example, they are the only company I've worked with that has a director of Green Chemistry - seeking innovations in how they reduce and eliminate toxics from their materials and explore new materials that can help them drive toward their goal of a closed loop material flow.

At the same time, I also see that if we only limit ourselves to encouraging change in companies so entrenched in the unsustainable system, we likely will not get there fast enough. Perhaps it's not a question of taking one approach or the other, but of doing both - trying to foster change and innovation within the current system, while also working to support the emergence of alternatives. Another exciting business model that has a great contribution to make to sustainability, in my view, is the co-operative business model. That's probably a discussion for another day!

Chad

This is a wonderful article, and I, too, especially enjoyed the metaphor. However, as a student in sustainability studies, I have always wondered why so much effort is put into case studies such as Nike, who present not a "radical transformation of the way we conduct business," but rather exemplify a "softly applying the brakes and only buying ourselves a little more time" approach.

I understand that turning giants such as Nike towards a model that embodies sustainability principles cannot happen overnight, however, there must be other examples that embody our ideal vision of a sustainable business. Perhaps I am impatient and have taken your car over the cliff metaphor too seriously, but incremental change within the context of a drastically deteriorating eco-system (assuming this is truly the case) bears more signs of business-as-usual than radical transformation. Excuse the pessimism.

To conclude, and speaking merely as a student, the only business model that I have been able to find that best exemplifies an "eco-capitalist" or a sustainable business model (in all its social, economic, and environmental dynamics) is TerraCycle. On a final note - perhaps a wish - I would love to see this company discussed more often in sustainability group circles.

...love that C. S. Lewis quote Per!

Great article Chad!
Reading your metaphore of the car running towards the cliff, I came to think of a C.S. Lewis-quote I just read:
‎"We all want progress, but if you're on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive."
/C. S. Lewis

All the best for the New Year!
Per Ribbing, Swedish Engineers for Sustainable Development associated to The Natural Step Sweden